Jose Rizal’s Retraction Controversy Essay

The debate still continues if Dr. Jose Rizal, our national hero, re anyy retracted? This has been the greatest contention which is most talked about Rizal. He is recognized for the novels he had written during the Spanish period. Because of these courageous acts of rebellion against the utter colonizers, he became our National Hero. however what if our national hero, at the last moments of his life retracted perpetuallyything he had ever said and written? In 1935, a garner was found by Father Manuel Garcia. The said letter contains that Jose Rizal declared himself as a Catholic and that he retracts everything he had said, written, published and did against the Catholic Church.Opinions regarding this issue would non be the same because some may agree and some may non. There so many another(prenominal) questions speculating his abjuration if in the first behind, all of this is what he really fought for. From Fr. Balaguers version, Rizal, on the 29th twenty-four hours of Dece mber 1896, wrote and signed the retraction text file in front of him and with the other Jesuit priest toast at the death cell. Rizal asked for a confession twice and for a rosary from the priest amidst the deuce confessions.In Balaguers memorandum-record, Rizal asked for a mass and a request for Holy Communion, this was readily approved by the Jesuits and assigned Fr. Villaclara as the officiating priest of the mass inside the cell. He also mentioned that Rizal asked for the image of the Sagrado Corazon de savior which he carved when he was full 14. Balaguer described the scene as heart-warming because Rizal kissed the image that he had quest from the Jesuits. While kneeling and outfoxed by the religious authorities in the death cell, Rizal read the retraction document. Balaguer also claimed that in that respect was a servant-messenger for Josephine Bracken to prepare for the marriage at the San Ignacio Church where Fr.Simo will address the confession and other things neede d for the ceremonies, which will be materialized on the morning of the 30th. Lastly, before the execution and in the presence of the Archbishop and the Jesuit superior Reverend Fr. Pio Pi, Rizal kissed the image of the cross presented to him and has a rosary entwined in his hand. But how did Father Balaguer convinced Rizal to be converted into Cathloic before his execution?This is one of the big unanswered questions of today. In addition to this, Rizal wrote a poem entitled My Last Farewell which was written on the eve of his execution, there was a line there saying,Ill go where there are no slaves, tyrants or hangmen where faith does not kill and where God alone does reign (Rizal, 1896).With this, he mentioned God in this poem. Before he was executed, he wrote an undated letter to his family when he was in Fort capital of Chile Bury me in the ground, place a stone and a cross everyplace it. My name, the date of my brith and of my death. Nothing more. If you later wish to surround my grave with a fence, you may do so. No anniversaries. I prefer Paang Bundok. Now, what do he base by this? He wanted a cross over it. He died as a Catholic and was buried inside the sacred grounds of Paco Cemetery.Unfortunately, his instructions were not granted. It was also argued that Rizal retracted in indian lodge to save his family from further persecution, to give Josephine Bracken a legal status as his wife and to plug reforms from the Spanish government. Speaking of Josephine as his wife, there was an article from Jose Rizal University that one day of earlyish March 1896 Rizal contend a practical joke on Josephine, which frightened her terribly. As a result, she prematurely gave carry to an eight-month nestling boy. The baby was very weak and can hardly breathe. With this, Rizal immediately baptized him Francisco in honor of his father. He tried to save the life of his son but all his experience and skill as a physician could not save little Francisco.Sorrowfully, Rizal saw his child die three hours after birth then he drew a sketch of his dead son and he buried him low a shady tree near his home. He prayed Oh, God, I give you another tiny angel. recreate bless his soul. Again, this is one proof that crimson before the exile in Dapitan, he practiced be a Catholic.On the other hand, the copy of the retraction paper that was allegedly signed by Rizal that was even kept secret and was only published in newspapers. It was said that the paper was lost when Rizals family pass on for the original copy. Are the Jesuits too irresponsible for not knowing the importance of the document? Or was it just hidden? But 39 years later, the original copy was found in the archdiocesan archives.Ricardo Pascual Ph. D, who was inclined permission by the Archbishop Nozaleda to test the document and later concluded in his book, Rizal beyond the Grave that the papers shown was a falsification. The common contradiction of this argument was either Father Balaguer or Father Pi had make errors in reproducing another copy of the original. The manuscript was also allegedlymisplaced from 1922 1935.Trinidad challenged the Jesuits to show to her the manuscripts so that she could corroborate that it was Rizals handwriting and signature. With this, finding out that there were several copies of it, some may imitate Rizals handwriting and signature. Another proof that Rizal did not retract is that when Father Balaguer claimed that Jose and Josephine, however, there were no marriage authentication or public record shown that could prove Father Balaguers accounts.In addition, he performed the ceremony between 600 615 AM of December 30, 1896 with the presence of one of the Rizals sisters but Rizal family denied that none of them were there and Dr. Jose Rizal was martyred at 703 AM. Also, nobody had reported that Bracken was in the area of Fort Santiago in the morning of the execution.Consider also the three priests (Fr. Jose Villaclara, Fr. Estanislao March, and Fr. Vicente Balaguer) to negotiate the expanse of the walk to give weird care to the condemned Dr. Jose Rizal, why is it that, only Fr. Balaguer stated that there was a wedding? Furthermore, where were Fr. Villaclara and Fr. March to verify the revelation of a marriage ceremony? Or was there really even one at all?Showing the two sides, where do you stand? Do you believe that Rizal really abjured or not? Its up to you but this controversy should not eradicate Rizals works for our republic. He awakened our knowledge of nationalism and patriotism. Jose Rizals writings helped in motivating the Filipinos to fight for our freedom against the Spanish colonizers and inspired a lot of Filipino revolutionaries to stand up for a cost. In my opinion, I still believe that his contributions to our country are far greater than the issue brought by this letter. I stick to his advocacy that war is not the solution for independence.If youre going to ask me if he really retract, I woul d say yes, because he really wanted to drop peace and to stop the chaos during that time, he abjured everything due to the pressure to his family and became a Catholic.I stated earlier that he has some requests to his family for his burial that there should be a cross over his grave, with this, he died as a Catholic and his family, on the 11th day after his death, was informed that early of the next day, a mass was to be celebrated for the eternal rest of his soul. Adding to this, he experienced hardships in writing his third novel entitled Makamisa because he is not fluent inFilipino language. How could he state A man who doesnt love his native language, is worse than all animals and a sickening fish., if he, himself, cant apply it.And lets understand that he retracted for the sake of his familys persecution and wanted a reform for our country against the Spanish government. Im sure all of us really love our family and will do such extraordinary things just to save them and would love to have peace on earth. But all this and more will retract nothing from his greatness as a Filipino.